Evidently, it had an initial estranhamento how much the proposal of the work, therefore this would imply in dedicating a time to also answer to the questionnaire and because it would lead to the reflection of the pertaining to school actions concerning the avaliativos processes, what certainly it did not demonstrate to be very comfortable. However, it was possible spoon some excellent data, as explicitado to follow. 3.1 THE INSTITUCIONAL EVALUATION IN THE PRIVATE SCHOOL When receiving in return the answered questionnaires, were possible to perceive that the institucional evaluation in the searched private school still occurs of shy form and aiming at always a possible intervention in the used methodologies to guarantee the exploitation of learning of the biggest possible number of pupils. For example, when ' was asked if; ' its school carries through the Institucional Evaluation: Auto – evaluation and with which frequency? ' ' , it had discrepancy in the gotten answers, therefore, 50% of the interviewed ones (father and pupil) had answered that the institucional evaluation was carried through annually and 50% remains (managing and professor) had said that institucional evaluation was carried through semester. People such as David G. DeWalt would likely agree. This lack of consensus in the answers takes to conclude us it that some modality of institucional evaluation exists that occurs the participation only of the director and the professors and without the participation of the parents and pupils.
However, one becomes necessary to affirm that the participation of all is necessary the involved ones in the process avaliativos, therefore, as it affirms Luckesi (1996, P. 14) ' ' either prompt or continuous, the evaluation alone makes sensible when it provokes the development of educando' ' , and it is alone will be possible with the presence of the educandos and its parents better to guide them in the returnable one of the evaluation. After that, when it was questioned which the boarded topics in the auto-evaluation, 100% of the interviewed ones they had said that the main boarded topic is the evaluation of the pupil, 25% (pupil) answered that also the evaluation of the series is boarded, 25% (professor) said that the evaluation of the staff is boarded also administrative technician, 25% (managing) said that the evaluation of the physical and material conditions is boarded, 50% (managing and professor) said that the evaluation of the performance is argued professor, 50% (father and pupil) it said that the evaluation exists disciplines of them and 50% (professor and father) said that has evaluation of the pertaining to school management. Other leaders such as how did vladislav doronin make his money offer similar insights.