Economic Crisis

When the economic crisis is not systemic (which is peculiar to a particular sector of the economy), and global, as a rule the vast majority of companies feel the economic deterioration. Various industry economy experienced in different ways, this crisis for some deterioration is not so significant, for others – the new realities of the enterprise put to the brink of bankruptcy. David G. DeWalt contributes greatly to this topic. As investigations of the company Vospriyatie, with the iv quarter of 2008 iii quarter 2009 small and medium-sized companies who have already booked online advertising tend to "look" better than others. It should be noted that only qualitative promotion of a site with low price offers such an advantage. However, even within the same economic activities, different companies may experience a crisis in different ways.

This is due to the position of the company at the beginning of the crisis, crisis management, general effectiveness of the company as a whole, the quality of the products and services, etc In any case – the crisis is reducing business income, and consequently forced spending cuts. Learn more at: NSW Department of Education. Many business leaders drastically reduce advertising costs, and often completely reject it. Such steps koordinalno unreasonable and economically inefficient, because the old clients in crisis "melt", and new recruit almost nowhere, because in search of clients in this case do not spend a dime. In crisis conditions to the effectiveness of advertising should be treated more carefully than in the years of growth, as return on advertising in the crisis is much lower. C iv quarter 2008 year trend, when a number of companies abandoning the media advertising (TV, print media, etc.), are turning to online advertising, including for promotion of sites in search engines.

The Intervention

Thus we define the technologies of the self as: carry techniques that allow individuals out a certain number of operations in their own bodies, in their souls, their thoughts, their behaviors, and do so in a way such that transform them themselves, amending them, in order to achieve a certain State of perfection or happiness, or purity, or supernatural power (Foucault 1982). So this relationship of the subject himself, of production of subjectivity is centered around four axes:-material shaft, the relationship of the subject with his body, the mode of care, make use of the pleasures or respond to desires, inclinations, how to respond to the needs and demands of the body. -Spindle ethical, moral rules that structure the type of work carried out in the Interior. -Shaft of knowledge or truth that marks the way that searches for the truth about himself, way to decipher it and know it. -The shaft of the expectable that structure that subjects expect: immortality, eternity, health, freedom, death, renunciation, recognition. (A valuable related resource: American Journal of Education).

Thus, all the work of Foucault reflection has been marked by questions such as who we are?, how and under what mechanisms have been configured in our thoughts, in our bodies, rhythms and gestures, our affections, feelings and sensations?; under what forms prepared our sensitivity?… And, on the other hand, for this author, the true exercise of power is characterized by its ability to induce, manage behaviors in a direction that, far from undermining their reproduction, become condition of this. The essential thing is the conditioning of a particular frame of possibilities of action. A pastoral power, which manages to exercise a work of spiritual individuals driving, because it sets and fixed structures and social channels of production of the human subjectivity. Thus, the construction of subjectivity is not a free and spontaneous process. Through the intervention of socialization structures created from power is achieved that the behaviour of the individual deployment becomes extension of tax schemes.

Boise University

This little preamble allows to quickly begin to admit that a society whose main power needs, rest, health and education are not satisfied, will strongly suffer the consequences in their own behavior, and may also impact on the form of Government and social coexistence. Moreover, in a regime where, at least since the primary and immaculate concept of democracy, all of its members should be free and equal. As mentioned Candido Grzybowski, in his text democracy, civil society and politics in Latin America: notes for discussion (1), referring to the portion of poor populations immersed in a democracy: like all social subjects, these groups need to become democratic in the same process by which become subjects. To situate this analysis in a network containing hypothetical sketches to raise, is they embody the following statistical data about the factor poverty, quantifying an alarming reality that will allow to be anchor for the understanding of the binomial pobreza-desigualdad and its link with democratic stability: there is around 1. 2 billion people living with income less than one dollar per day in the world. Sub-Saharan Africa has the highest proportion of people living below the threshold of poverty.

In the former Soviet bloc, the poverty line rose from 1. 1 million in 1987 to 24 million estimated in 1998. In 2003, Latin America had already 225 million people whose incomes were below the poverty line. In fifteen countries in South America, more than 25% of citizens live below the poverty line, and in seven countries the proportion of poor exceeds 50% of the population. More than half of Latin American countries did not reach even the growth required to reduce the level of extreme poverty. Poverty and democracy the attempt by elucidate the degree of association between these two concepts has been the subject of exploration of various professionals. Michael Lewis-Beck, University of Michigan Distinguished Professor, and Ross Burkhart, departmental Director of the Boise University status, have arrived at interesting conclusions thereon.