One of sectors not included in the curriculum of schools and the vast majority of universities is the basic financial education. The vast majority of young people who end up with the school are educated to earn money, but they can’t balance a checkbook and much less invest money that will win in their lives. Vacuum like ante in their children’s education, you need parents to assume the role of educating them in the basics of finance and enter them into the world of money. The problem is that many parents have not received adequate training in this area and do not have the knowledge to teach their children. If you are not convinced, visit Campbell Soup Co. Solution: Learn along with them! Do and what better way to do it than playing an educational game in which their children will learn about the financial issues in natural, entertaining and effective way? Do apart from the Monopoly, which is a classic, I recommend Roberto Kiyosaki, Cashflow games for Kids for children up to 8 years and Cashflow 101? for older children and adults who want to start in the world of investments with the right mentality. Below I give 15 important lessons that my children learned playing Cashflow 101. 1.
The concept of the career of rats our education system intends to train people that are inserted successfully into the labour market. Why the vast majority of people, independent of their level of education, does not question the fact that someday they will work at least 8 hours a day as an employee or as a used car, changing their hours for money. They are unaware that there are other options that allow you to generate money and are automatically trapped in the career of the rats once they begin with their working lives. 2. No matter the amount of money you have, but liabilities that you’re able to generate when we started with the game, my children focused on earning more and more money.
The humble leader knows when fulfilled their time, when You should relegate his activity to his successor, the same as the I am, knows his time and its transience, when the delivery your management to his team, the mismosque led him to be their leader, if he is not committed to its impermanence can only say that it was not a leader, he was a dictator. It is sad to see the lack of implementation of the concept of open doors, where the leader allows the constant involvement of all its collaborators, all without excluding any, any opinions should be taken into account, this eagerness to teledirigir, or a management without human approach is not possible, knowing all the aspects that underlie actions should be directedYou must go with the premise of individual problems. It is not based on an address from desktop, simply share the point of view of our collaborators will make us change our perspective to reach a term best of the company’s activities and realize the so dreamed indexes and goals. For the current leader must be an exercise that go processes to observe and talk with the collaborators of its shortcomings and listen to opinions and ideas of solution, a healthy exercise which in turn has the purpose of bringing to the team with which the company has. Based on the premise that to be leader must belong to a group, this term covers a concept very specific that it is to be part of the group, this means everyone must consider their status and participation, each who must play their role within the company where the leader not only directed, must consider everything that encompasses a transcendence leadership supported the active participation, the fact of being part of the Group and that the contribute in function Director not delegated mandate action, a humble leader shares these responsibilities with his team. .
We must place on record that in one Master’s degree or doctorate in law not all languages can be studied from a point of view legal, but only in very elementary form, therefore, it is clear that we must study how studies to part, to effect to make comparative law also with regard to right of countries in which it is spoken foreign languages, as they are by the way those mentioned previously. We note that dictates the professional career of languages, which we consider that it should be studied in order to right compared with all the advantage that may be necessary, however, few have taken into account these studies, and in any case it is clear that we do not know of any Peruvian survey who has studied this career in Cesar Vallejo University in Lima, therefore, must put on record that the market be free so that young lawyers can start their studies in this subject. It is necessary to put on record that the world not languages are spoken only two as would be by the way the English and the Spanish, which must be subject of study by writers, and even languages may be matter of comparison. I.e., this topic is very extensive, so it is clear that we must take into account in order to understand the comparative, e.g. law if we compare the Chinese and German with Italian law, or when we want to study that family legal belongs to Japan and China to. Comparative law is the discipline legal in which language technicians have greater importance, which should be a matter of study by writers. I.e. not only enough to know the languages but also must master is the language from a point of view or juridical approach, e.g. English law or French law, German law, Chinese law, Japanese law, Brazilian law, Portuguese legal, among other cases.