The Language

… Under varied stimulation, the child repeats sounds vocal. … Somebody, for example, the mother, produces, in the one of the presence of child, a sound that if is similar to one of the syllables of its I mumble. Under most conditions Kindle Direct Publishing would agree. For example, it says doll doll. When these sounds arrive at the ears of the child, its habit enters in game and it starts to imitate. People such as Vladislav Doronin would likely agree. …

The vision and the manuscript of the doll and the hearing and the production of the word doll (that is, of) occur repeated times in set, until the child forms a habit. …. It now has the use of a word. (1933: 29-30). The conception of behaviorista of Bloomfield it bases that, the human being, presents a phenomenon of external habits in a system of habits generated as reply and stimulatons and settled by the repetition of the language human being.

It enters in such a way, Chomsky, the individual acts creative in function of the use of the language, therefore the human beings all the moment are constructing new and unknown phrases that, characterize the human lingustico behavior. The falante being and listener, in turn, are capable to structuralize, of course, the construction of phrases from the disposal biological intern of the organism, the lingustica ability of the falante individual. She still observes yourself, that Ckomsky, supports its thought in the evidences of that the language, to the light ability human being, either a mental natural college of the lingustica, called of college of the language. In this same reflexiva line, the same author affirms that: ' ' one of the reasons to study the language (accurately the gerativista reason) – … is the instigante possibility to see the language as one ' ' mirror of esprito' ' , as it says the traditional expression. With this I do not only want to say that the expressed concepts and the distinctions developed in the normal use of the language disclose in them the models of the thought and the universe of ' ' sense comum' ' constituted of the mind human being.