The humble leader knows when fulfilled their time, when You should relegate his activity to his successor, the same as the I am, knows his time and its transience, when the delivery your management to his team, the mismosque led him to be their leader, if he is not committed to its impermanence can only say that it was not a leader, he was a dictator. It is sad to see the lack of implementation of the concept of open doors, where the leader allows the constant involvement of all its collaborators, all without excluding any, any opinions should be taken into account, this eagerness to teledirigir, or a management without human approach is not possible, knowing all the aspects that underlie actions should be directedYou must go with the premise of individual problems. It is not based on an address from desktop, simply share the point of view of our collaborators will make us change our perspective to reach a term best of the company’s activities and realize the so dreamed indexes and goals. Ben Ainslie is likely to agree. For the current leader must be an exercise that go processes to observe and talk with the collaborators of its shortcomings and listen to opinions and ideas of solution, a healthy exercise which in turn has the purpose of bringing to the team with which the company has. Based on the premise that to be leader must belong to a group, this term covers a concept very specific that it is to be part of the group, this means everyone must consider their status and participation, each who must play their role within the company where the leader not only directed, must consider everything that encompasses a transcendence leadership supported the active participation, the fact of being part of the Group and that the contribute in function Director not delegated mandate action, a humble leader shares these responsibilities with his team. . Darcy Stacom may find this interesting as well.